DevOps & SRE Infrastructure Strategy Review
An infrastructure strategy review is a bounded, outside read on the systems and decisions your team lives with every day: how your architecture is actually shaped, where your Terraform/OpenTofu and CI/CD workflows are fighting you, how reliability and ownership are distributed, and which of those things will hurt the most as you scale. It is deliberately fixed-scope — a clear start, a clear end, and a written deliverable — rather than an open-ended engagement that quietly turns into staff augmentation.
The goal is not to hand you a generic best-practices checklist. It is to look hard at your real environment, name the risks and tradeoffs in plain language, and leave you with a prioritized set of recommendations your team can actually act on. Most teams use this as the first engagement precisely because it is low-commitment, high-signal, and produces something durable: a shared, honest picture of where you stand and what to do next.
What this engagement includes
Fixed-scope advisory with a written deliverable — structured so your team gets clarity without open-ended dependency.
What’s included
- Intake session to align on scope, context, and the decisions you are weighing
- Review of architecture, Terraform/OpenTofu structure, and CI/CD workflows
- Live working session to pressure-test assumptions with your team
- Written findings memo: risks, tradeoffs, and what is actually working
- Prioritized recommendations you can sequence and own internally
- Optional leadership readout to align stakeholders on the path forward
How it works
- Intake call to confirm fit, scope, stakeholders, and systems in view
- Async review of architecture, repos, and workflows before the live session
- Working session with your leads to pressure-test assumptions
- Written findings memo with prioritized, sequenced recommendations
Who it’s for
Engineering teams and leaders preparing for a migration, redesign, or scaling phase who want a senior outside read on architecture, reliability, and operating model before committing to a direction. Fits DevOps, SRE, platform, and cloud teams that can execute but want clarity on what to prioritize.
How teams usually engage
Most offerings follow the same bounded shape — timing flexes with scope, but you always get a clear deliverable.
Fixed-Scope Review
Bounded engagement with a clear start, end, and written deliverable — not open-ended staff aug.
Working Session
Live time with your leads to pressure-test assumptions and align on tradeoffs.
Written Findings Memo
Prioritized risks, tradeoffs, and recommendations your team can sequence and own.
Optional Readout
Leadership or stakeholder session to align on the path forward after the review.
This engagement is a fit if…
- You are preparing for a migration, redesign, or scaling phase and want clarity before committing
- Architecture and CI/CD decisions feel increasingly expensive to unwind
- Leadership wants an outside read, not another internal debate with no written outcome
- You need prioritized next steps your team can own — not a generic best-practices deck
Start with Infrastructure Strategy Review.
Most engagements start with a quick intake call to confirm fit, scope, and timing — no long sales cycle. Tell us about your team, your systems, and the decisions you’re weighing.
Request a Review → ← All advisory servicesWant a feel for how Brian thinks first? Browse the Platform Engineering episodes on Ship It Weekly.