Senior outside perspective

Infrastructure advisory for teams making decisions that are hard to unwind.

I help engineering teams review cloud architecture, Terraform/OpenTofu structure, CI/CD workflows, platform engineering direction, reliability practices, and AI-driven operational risk before those decisions turn into expensive production problems.

Architecture Reviews Terraform / OpenTofu CI/CD Governance Platform Strategy Reliability AI-Era Operational Risk
DevOps & SRE infrastructure advisory โ€” abstract compass illustration

Outside perspective, not staff augmentation.

This is strategic review and guidance for engineering teams that need senior technical judgment, not another set of hands writing tickets.

I am not coming in to become your ticket queue or to write every Terraform module. I'm here to help your team see risks earlier, reason through tradeoffs, and make better decisions in the rooms where those decisions actually get made.

The work is structured, bounded, and documented. You walk away with clarity, prioritized recommendations, and shared language inside your team โ€” not a dependency on me.

Grounding in migrations, Kafka, and governance.

Illustrative scope from prior roles — not an endorsement of any vendor or employer.

Co-led AWS → GCP migration programs with operational cutover discipline.
Owned Kafka through Confluent Cloud → MSK → Confluent Cloud (private networking), including Schema Registry and MirrorMaker2 / Replicator transitions.
Supported public-company readiness from an infrastructure and platform angle.
SOC2 evidence leadership across multiple audit cycles; SOX control-readiness support.
Deep PCI / SOC2 program work in HIPAA-era environments; DR ownership with RTO/RPO targets.
CTO experience, including a zero-downtime cloud migration for a digital-signage portfolio.
Former engineering manager; executive-ready communication under pressure.

The kinds of pain this work resolves.

If two or three of these sound familiar, advisory is probably the right wedge.

๐Ÿงฑ

Terraform or Terragrunt has grown messy and nobody trusts the structure anymore.

๐Ÿ”

CI/CD workflows are powerful but increasingly hard to govern, audit, or change safely.

๐ŸŽŸ๏ธ

Platform engineering is becoming a support queue instead of a product with adoption.

๐Ÿค–

AI tools and agents are entering engineering workflows without clear permission boundaries.

๐Ÿ’ธ

Cloud cost, reliability, and ownership are getting tangled together โ€” and decisions slow down.

๐Ÿšš

Teams are preparing for a migration, redesign, or scaling phase and need an outside read first.

๐Ÿ“Š

Engineering leadership needs a clear, technical outside read on infrastructure risk.

Pick the shape that fits the problem.

In 2026, most engagements still start with a fixed-scope review. Retainers come after trust โ€” but they're available day one when the problem is clear.

MOST COMMON FIRST ENGAGEMENT
Most common first step

Infrastructure Strategy Review

A fixed-scope review of your architecture, workflows, risks, and operating model. Bounded engagement, written deliverable, prioritized next steps.

Best forTeams that want a clear outside opinion on what's working, what's risky, and what to prioritize next.
Investment
Request a Review โ†’
Timely & differentiated

AI-Era Infrastructure Risk Review

A focused review of where AI-assisted delivery, CI/CD, automation, secrets, permissions, and SaaS integrations create operational blast radius.

Best forTeams adopting AI tools, coding agents, CI/CD automation, or internal developer platforms.
Investment
Request an AI Review โ†’
Ongoing partnership

Advisory Retainer

Ongoing access to a senior infrastructure advisor for recurring architecture, platform, reliability, and AI-risk decisions. Async + scheduled sessions.

Best forEngineering leaders and platform teams that want a senior outside voice without hiring a full-time staff/principal engineer.
Investment
Discuss a Retainer โ†’
IaC & operating model

Terraform Architecture Review

A fixed-scope review of your Terraform/OpenTofu structure, state boundaries, module design, promotion paths, and review workflows — before the mess becomes the operating model.

Best forTeams whose infrastructure code has outgrown simple examples and needs an outside read on structure, ownership, and sustainability.
Investment
Request a Terraform Review โ†’
Platform strategy

Platform Engineering Advisory

Outside guidance on paved roads, adoption, support boundaries, and platform maturity — so your platform team builds a product teams choose, not a portal nobody uses.

Best forPlatform teams past the “we stood up Kubernetes” milestone who need help with adoption, governance, and sustainable support models.
Investment
Discuss Platform Advisory โ†’
SaaS & scale

DevOps Advisory for SaaS Teams

Strategic DevOps and SRE guidance for SaaS engineering orgs navigating multi-tenant risk, release velocity, compliance pressure, and infrastructure decisions that are hard to unwind.

Best forSaaS engineering leaders balancing shipping speed with reliability, audit readiness, and a cloud bill that keeps growing.
Investment
Request SaaS Advisory โ†’
CI/CD & toolchain

GitHub Actions Security Review

A focused review of GitHub Actions, self-hosted runners, secrets, permissions, and workflow blast radius — treating your developer toolchain as the production control plane it has become.

Best forTeams using GitHub Actions at scale who need an honest read on permissions, supply-chain risk, and governance gaps before an incident or audit.
Investment
Request a GitHub Actions Review โ†’
Kubernetes & SRE

Kubernetes Reliability Review

A bounded review of how your clusters are operated day-two: observability, autoscaling, upgrades, failure modes, and the gap between the getting-started guide and production reality.

Best forTeams running Kubernetes in production who want an outside read on reliability risks, operability, and what to fix before the next incident.
Investment
Request a K8s Reliability Review โ†’

Explore each engagement.

Each engagement has its own page with what it covers, what you walk away with, who it’s for, and how to start.

Infrastructure Strategy Review

A fixed-scope review of your architecture, workflows, risks, and operating model. Bounded engagement, written deliverable, prioritized next steps.

Explore this service →
AI-Era Infrastructure Risk Review

A focused review of where AI-assisted delivery, CI/CD, automation, secrets, permissions, and SaaS integrations create operational blast radius.

Explore this service →
Advisory Retainer

Ongoing access to a senior infrastructure advisor for recurring architecture, platform, reliability, and AI-risk decisions. Async + scheduled sessions.

Explore this service →
Terraform Architecture Review

A fixed-scope review of your Terraform/OpenTofu structure, state boundaries, module design, promotion paths, and review workflows — before the mess becomes the operating model.

Explore this service →
Platform Engineering Advisory

Outside guidance on paved roads, adoption, support boundaries, and platform maturity — so your platform team builds a product teams choose, not a portal nobody uses.

Explore this service →
DevOps Advisory for SaaS Teams

Strategic DevOps and SRE guidance for SaaS engineering orgs navigating multi-tenant risk, release velocity, compliance pressure, and infrastructure decisions that are hard to unwind.

Explore this service →
GitHub Actions Security Review

A focused review of GitHub Actions, self-hosted runners, secrets, permissions, and workflow blast radius — treating your developer toolchain as the production control plane it has become.

Explore this service →
Kubernetes Reliability Review

A bounded review of how your clusters are operated day-two: observability, autoscaling, upgrades, failure modes, and the gap between the getting-started guide and production reality.

Explore this service →

The shape of the deliverable.

Bounded, structured, and useful โ€” designed to leave behind clarity, not dependency.

Intake session
Artifact & repo review
Live working session
Written findings memo
Prioritized recommendations
Optional leadership readout
Optional retainer follow-up

What this isn't.

Honest scope so the wrong buyers self-select out.

Advisory doesn't include:

  • Day-to-day ticket execution
  • Emergency break/fix production support
  • Writing all your Terraform for you
  • Replacing your internal DevOps team
  • Vendor implementation disguised as strategy
  • Long-term staff-augmentation contracts

Get senior infrastructure judgment in the room.

Most engagements start with a quick intake call to confirm fit, scope, and timing. No long sales cycle.

Scroll to Top